Structured academic controversy allows students to discuss controversial topics in a way that promotes critical thinking, decision-making and problem-solving skills. Since the discussion is not a debate, it does not force students to make a decision but rather focus on tackling topic ambiguities and complexities. Likewise, social interaction and exposure to unique life experiences create productive discussions.
- This teaching strategy may be used in K-12 and in college environments. Younger students may have a difficult time eliciting their opinions as they may require life experiences.
- Students can participate without limits or set expectations.
- Encourages dialogue and problem-solving.
- Create interactions between instructor-student and student-student groups.
- Explain student roles and responsibilities so that discussions remain respectful and conductive to learning.
- Encourage students to explore distinct types of perspectives when discussing topics.
- Allow students to comment on questions that may not have definitive answers.
- Reinforce balance between instructor and student dynamics
Structured academic controversy allows students the opportunity to discuss difficult issues in a safe and productive environment. More importantly, since students are not required to choose a side on the issue, the classroom does not become a debate room. Instead the conversation remains open and more conducive to finding solutions. It is also important to understand constructivism and what role it plays in student communication